Reported 12 months ago
In Kaohsiung, a building residents' committee was unhappy with a developer renting the first and second floors to a gym, impacting the quality of living. The committee added a new regulation to prohibit gyms, prompting the gym to move out. This led to a lawsuit between the developer and the committee, with the court ruling in favor of the developer in the second appeal. The gym was compared to dance halls, hotels, and arcades in the building's regulations. The committee's rules were deemed unreasonable, but they may appeal the decision. The residents were concerned about noise and believed the gym would adversely affect their living environment. The developer argued that there was no concrete evidence of the gym affecting the quality of life. The case involved disputes over property rights and the reasonableness of regulations.
Source: YAHOO